Indicator Details (Draft)
The following Indicators have been selected by the various citizen working groups to be monitored and reported as part of the NSIP effort:
Download the full report (2.1MB PDF)
Green Energy
- Total Residential Energy Consumption
- Total Non-Residential Energy Consumption
- Total Renewable Energy Production
- Number of Buildings that have Implemented an EMP and/or Adopted a Green Scorecard System
- Percent of Participating Buildings that Meet or Exceed Minimum Requirements of the Neighborhood Green Scorecard
Green Environment
Green Environment
- Average Potable Water Usage
- Number of RiverSmart Homes in the NSIPP area
- Water Quality Indicators
- Percent of Land Area Under Tree Canopy
- Carbon Sequestered by Trees in the Community
Green Economy
Green Social Capital
Green Energy
Total residential electrical and gas energy consumption
Definition
Total annual electrical and gas energy consumption for residential units in the Pilot Project area.
Sustainability Relevance
Energy consumption is directly relevant to carbon emissions as well as lifestyle choices. Energy conservation is one of the top priorities identified NSIP’s sustainability vision, as defined by the community.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Increase Energy Conservation; Increase Production of Renewable Energy; and Increase Greener Modes of Transit
Related Actions
Create Energy Audit and Weatherizations Drives in the Community; Organize “Energy Diet” Programs / Challenges; Promote a “Lights Off!” Initiative to Encourage Local Institutions / Residents to Turn Off Non-essential Lights; Conduct Energy Efficiency Drives Promoting EnergyStar Appliances, CFLs, etc.; Conduct Green Roof and Cool Roof Drives for Local Businesses and Institutions.
Pilot Project Indicator Target
22% reduction from 2009 baseline by the year 2020 on annual rate of 2%
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze neighborhood trends in reducing overall residential electrical energy use. Comparisons would be relative to neighborhood performance in previous years. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting NSIP Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
Total non-residential energy use; Total renewable energy production; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area.
Responsible Agent(s)
Office of Planning
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Purely focused on residential electrical consumption. Typically, electrical consumption only accounts for 50-60% of total household energy consumption. The data is aggregated for an entire zip code (20008) and does not include the entire study area.
Data Sources
PEPCO and Washington Gas. PEPCO’s data ranged from November 2008 to October 2009 and included 8568 residential records. Washington Gas’ data was for the 2009 calendar year and included 5,459 residential premises (including group metered apartments).
Methodology / Calculation
Acquire PEPCO and Washington Gas raw data by accounts within zip codes covering the study area and calculate total annual consumption for each residential account. Indicator totals will be the sum of all residential accounts in the selected zip code (20008). Procurement goal would be 100% sample from PEPCO and Washington Gas, however if 100% sample is unfeasible, sample size will be recorded and documented.
References
DC Energy Annual Report, DC Climate Action Plan, PEPCO Data Reports
Total non-residential electrical and gas energy consumption
Definition
Total annual electrical and gas energy consumption for non-residential units in the Pilot Project Area.
Sustainability Relevance
Energy consumption is directly relevant to carbon emissions as well as lifestyle choices. Energy conservation is one also one of the top priorities defined by the Pilot Project Area’s sustainability vision, as defined by the community.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Increase Energy Conservation; Increase Production of Renewable Energy; and Increase Greener Modes of Transit
Related Actions
Create Energy Audit and Weatherizations Drives in the Community; Organize “Energy Diet” Programs / Challenges; Promote a “Lights Off!” Initiative to Encourage Local Institutions / Residents to Turn Off Non-essential Lights; Conduct Energy Efficiency Drives Promoting EnergyStar Appliances, CFLs, etc.; Conduct Green Roof and Cool Roof Drives for Local Businesses and Institutions
Pilot Project Indicator Target
22% reduction from 2009 baseline by the year 2020 on annual rate of 2%
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze neighborhood trends in reducing overall non-residential electrical energy use. Comparisons would be relative to neighborhood performance in previous years. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting NSIP Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
Total residential energy use; Total renewable energy production; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area
Responsible Agent(s)
Office of Planning
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Purely focused on non-residential electrical consumption. Typically, electrical consumption only accounts for 60-70% of total building energy consumption.
Data Sources
PEPCO and Washington Gas. PEPCO’s data ranged from November 2008 to October 2009 and included 740 commercial records. Washington Gas’ data was for the 2009 calendar year and included 532 non-residential premises (including industrial and non-firm premises).
Methodology / Calculation
Acquire PEPCO and Washington Gas raw data by accounts within study area and calculate total annual consumption for each commercial account. Indicator will be calculated as the sum of all commercial accounts within the selected zip code. Procurement goal would be 100 Procurement goal would be 100% sample from PEPCO and Washington Gas, however if 100% sample is unfeasible, sample size will be recorded and documented.
References
DC Energy Annual Report, DC Climate Action Plan, PEPCO Data Reports
Total Renewable Energy Production
Definition
Total annual kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Project area
Sustainability Relevance
Renewable energy is green energy. It is also quickly becoming affordable energy. Switching to renewable energy sources like solar, wind, geothermal and biomass, will reduce dependence on a shrinking supply of fossil fuels by producing more renewable energy. The Pilot Project Area can also contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gases that lead to climate change.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Increase Energy Conservation; Increase Production of Renewable Energy; and Increase Greener Modes of Transit; Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’
Related Actions
Create Energy Cooperatives to buy/install renewable energy solutions in the neighborhood residences and businesses; Organize a “Renewable Energy Sign-up” Drive; Organize and host neighborhood workshops about renewable energy products and programs
Pilot Project Indicator Target
Achieve 20% energy from renewable sources by 2020.
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting NSIP Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area
Responsible Agent(s)
Office of Planning
Frequency of Update
At least once / 6 months
Limitations
DDOE data does not capture all renewable energy installations.
Data Sources
DDOE - Energy Office, Neighborhood Energy Cooperatives
Methodology / Calculation
Indicator is calculated directly from raw data collected from DDOE and Neighborhood Energy Cooperatives.
References
DC Energy Annual Report, DC Climate Action Plan
Number of Buildings That Have Implemented an EMP and/or Adopted a Green Scorecard System
Definition
Number of buildings in the study area that have implemented an Environmental Management Plan and/or have adopted a Green Scorecard System
Sustainability Relevance
The study area has a high population of residents living in multifamily housing developments, and drafting an Environmental Management Plan will enable residents in those buildings to work together to ensure that building maintenance, operations, and communications prioritize sustainable practices. EMPs can similarly benefit other non-single-family-residential buildings like churches, museums, and embassies.
Related Neighborhood Goals
“Increase the Number and Quality of Local Green Businesses; Increase Environmental Management of Buildings; Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’”
Related Actions
Create a condo/business green rating system; Create an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for multifamily dwellings, rentals, churches and other institutional anchors; Organize drive to promote local institutions/businesses/condos to adopt an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) that encourages green operations
ANC Indicator Target
Recommended two pilot EMP buildings by 2011
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
“Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use; Total kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Area; Average Potable Water Usage; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot area”
Responsible Agent(s)
Workgroup Coordinators
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Number of buildings do not necessarily represent the scope of actual implemented measures.
Data Sources
Workgroup records
Percent of participating buildings that meet or exceed minimum requirements of the neighborhood Green Scorecard
Definition
Number of buildings that have achieved the highest rating possible on their Green Scorecard rating
Sustainability Relevance
Tracking Green Scorecard ratings for buildings ensures active implementation of sustainability measures.
Related Neighborhood Goals
“Increase the Number and Quality of Local Green Businesses; Increase Environmental Management of Buildings; Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’”
Related Actions
Create a condo/business green rating system; Create an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for multifamily dwellings, rentals, churches and other institutional anchors; Organize drive to promote local institutions/businesses/condos to adopt an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) that encourages green operations
Pilot Project Indicator Target
100% of participating buildings exceeding minimum Green Scorecard requirements.
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
“Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use; Total kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Area; % change in total Metro ridership; Average Potable Water Usage; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot area”
Responsible Agent(s)
Workgroup Coordinators
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Measured percentage is only for participating buildings and does not reflect all neighborhood building stock.
Data Sources
Workgroup records
Methodology / Calculation
Comparing participating buildings’ scorecards and counting the quantity of buildings that exceed minimum requirements.
Green Environment
Average Potable Water Usage
Definition
Average potable water consumption for a typical residential unit in the Pilot Project area on an daily basis
Sustainability Relevance
Water is vital to the survival of our planet, and communities across the nation are facing issues related to water supply and infrastructure. Residential potable water use also contributes significantly to carbon emissions through energy consumption associated with water heaters.
Related Neighborhood Goals
“Increase Water Conservation; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams; Increase Energy Conservation”
Related Actions
Launch “Stop-the-Drip” Campaign to educate residents to repair leaky/wasteful faucets; Launch “Green Gardeners” program to educate/assist local residents, business owners, and institutions on the fundamentals of green gardening practices and LID; Create a Rainwater Harvesting/Greywater reuse initiative to promote reduced potable water use for irrigation
Pilot Project Indicator Target
20% consumption reduction
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
Number of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot Project area; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area
Responsible Agent(s)
Office of Planning
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Data is limited to residential use only and to a partial population. This is still useful for a trend analysis but may not be entirely representative of the total water use within the study area.
Data Sources
WASA
Methodology / Calculation
Data as provided by WASA
References
WASA annual report and other studies
Number of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot Area
Definition
Total number of homes in the study area that have completed the RiverSmart program through DDOE
Sustainability Relevance
Participation in the RiverSmart Homes program benefits the environment by minimizing the use of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers used in conventional landscaping; stabilizing soils, helping to prevent erosion; providing increased habitat for native wildlife; reducing air pollution and the urban heat island effect; treating and infiltrating stormwater on site helping to recharge groundwater levels; diminishing the impact on aquatic life from polluted stormwater rushing to local streams during storm events.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Increase Water Conservation; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams
Related Actions
Create a Rain Garden/LID resource group that promotes and assists residents/institutions with information/installations; Create a “No-Chemicals!” campaign to reduce chemical pesticides/herbicides/fertilizer use; Launch Initiative to advocate for water quality and LID issues at local public/design review meetings; Facilitate green landscaping workshops for local landscape firms (SARE Coordination)
Pilot Project Indicator Target
Double the number of RiverSmart homes in the study area compared to the 2010 baseline.
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
Average Potable Water Usage; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area
Responsible Agent(s)
Office of Planning
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Indicates participation but not a quantification of water conservation and quality improvements
Data Sources
DDOE
References
Water Quality Indicators
Definition
The water quality of the study area is proposed to be monitored by four key indicators. These indicators were selected based on availability of monitoring data for Soapstone Creek within the study area.
Pathogens: Fecal Coliform bacteria in freshwater streams may indicate presence of disease-carrying organisms in the water. The sources of these contaminants are typically wastewater treatment plant discharges, failing septic systems, and animal waste.
Lead (Pb) is a heavy metal contaminant that is usually caused by corrosive plumbing in buildings and can cause serious human health issues.
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) concentrations and turbidity both indicate the amount of solids suspended in the water, whether mineral (e.g., soil particles) or organic (e.g., algae). High concentrations of particulate matter can cause increased sedimentation and siltation in a stream, which in turn can ruin important habitat areas for fish and other aquatic life.
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) measures the amount of oxygen consumed by microorganisms in decomposing organic matter in stream water. The greater the BOD, the more rapidly oxygen is depleted in the stream. This means less oxygen is available to fish and other aquatic life.
Sustainability Relevance
The health and water quality of the Soapstone Creek impacts the quality of Rock Creek, the Potomac River, and the greater Chesapeake Bay habitat. Reducing the amount of pollutants by adhering to TMDLs helps meet Chesapeake Bay-wide water quality targets and enhances the quality of potable water quality, recreational attractions, and natural habitats.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Increase Water Conservation; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams
Related Actions
Practice organic gardening; Install a rain garden / other Low Impact Development measure; Reduce pervious surfaces to lower stormwater runoff from property; Control pet waste; Decholorinate swimming pool discharge; Reduce waste and trash
Pilot Project Indicator Target
Except for lead, there were no total maximum daily load (TMDL) targets for pollutants in Soapstone Creek. Current monitoring practices use different units for calculating loads than in the recent past so direct comparison of loading is not feasible. Based on historical trends a 25 percent reduction in annual load is targeted for fecal coliform, TSS, BOD and phosphorus. A 36 percent reduction is the target for lead, based on the 2004 TMDL.
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Analysis will document the pollutant levels reported in the DDOE’s annual Discharge Monitoring Report and compare against yearly targets
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
# of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP pilot area; average potable water usage; # of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP pilot area; % of land area under tree canopy
Responsible Agent(s)
Office of Planning
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Pollutants in the Soapstone Creek may originate from activities upstream and beyond the study area, therefore successfully actions to reduce pollutant levels in the study area may not be quantifiable.
Data Sources
Baseline data source: Discharge Monitoring Report (August 2007),Table 10. Calculated Loadings of 20 Pollutants from Wet Weather Events (2006-2007) from Ten Rock Creek Monitoring Stations, p. 17
Target data sources: Decision Rationale TMDL For Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Rock Creek (February 2004), Table 2-TMDL Summary, p. 3; Decision Rationale TMDL Rock Creek for Metals (February 2004), Table 9-Average Annual Total Lead Loads in Rock Creek, p. 15; targets for TSS and BOD are historic TSS and BOD levels found in Discharge Monitoring Report (August 2006),Table 7-9. Load Estimates of 12 Pollutants for The Rock Creek Monitoring Stations (2003-2005)
References
Percent of Land Area Under Tree Canopy
Definition
Percent of total land area in the Pilot Project Area that lies directly beneath tree canopy
Sustainability Relevance
Urban forests are recognized as important storage sites for carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas. Trees reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide by directly sequestering carbon dioxide in their stems and leaves as they grow. Trees in urban forests provide additional air quality benefits and can be a sound method for controlling air pollution.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Restore, Enhance, and Protect Tree Canopy; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams
Related Actions
Organize Community Tree Planting Drives (CPTs) with Casey Trees; Institute ‘Adopt-a-Tree’ Campaign to promote care and protection of trees; Protect existing trees during the construction process
Pilot Project Indicator Target
Maintain existing canopy cover.
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
“Number of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot area; Carbon sequestered by trees in the community; Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use”
Responsible Agent(s)
Office of Planning
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Data does not reflect the quality, health, and diversity of tree cover.
Data Sources
DDOE
Methodology / Calculation
GIS analysis using tree-cover layer
References
Casey Trees Interactive Mapping Tools
Carbon Sequestered by Trees in the Community
Definition
Amount of carbon sequestered by tress planted in the study area
Sustainability Relevance
Urban forests are recognized as important storage sites for carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas. Trees reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide by directly sequestering carbon dioxide in their stems and leaves as they grow. Trees in urban forests provide additional air quality benefits and can be a sound method for controlling air pollution.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Restore, Enhance, and Protect Tree Canopy; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams
Related Actions
Organize Community Tree Planting Drives (CPTs) with Casey Trees; Institute ‘Adopt-a-Tree’ Campaign to promote care and protection of trees; Protect existing trees during the construction process
Pilot Project Indicator Target
Maintain existing canopy cover.
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
“# of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot area; % of land area under tree canopy; Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use”
Responsible Agent(s)
Workgroup Coordinators
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Data is based on approximate tree counts derived from GIS land cover. GHG calculation is based on a generalized carbon sequestration rate for the typical species mix for the study area.
Data Sources
DCOP GIS dataset, Casey Trees
Methodology / Calculation
Estimated GHG calculation is based on an average 40 pounds (0.02 MTons) of Co2 sequestered per tree per year for street trees and 7 MTCoi2e per acre or woodland
References
USEPA, USDA
Mobility
Percent Change in WMATA and Capital Bikeshare Ridership
Definition
Percent change in average week-day entries in May at Van Ness-UDC and Tenleytown-AU Metros. Percent change in average monthly Capital Bikeshare ridership.
Sustainability Relevance
The District of Columbia is already a national leader in sustainable transportation, ranking 1st nationwide in walkability and 2nd in heavy rail ridership, with 96% of residents live within 1/4 mile of a public transit stop. Increasing transit use in the Pilot area will reduce personal vehicle use, which will lead to improvements in air quality, water quality, and fossil fuel emissions reductions.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Increase Energy Conservation; Increase Production of Renewable Energy; and Increase Greener Modes of Transit
Related Actions
Establish a committee that will review and explore shared shuttle programs with local institutions; Form a group that tracks gaps and improvements on local sidewalks/bikeways and trails; Establish a facebook page to facilitate car pooling
Pilot Project Indicator Target
5% increase in WMATA and Capital Bikeshare ridership from the 2010 baseline
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate. Average week-day enteries in May will be used because WMATA uses May as their most representative month because there are no holidays, major celebrations and weather conditions are usually pretty stable. The Capital Bikeshare baseline data references October 2010 beause that was the only full month of data available. Subsequent reports should document average monthly bikeshare ridership over 12 months.
Responsible Agent(s)
Office of Planning
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Transit users for destinations outside the study area (such as American University) may skew the ridership data for the study area.
Data Sources
WMATA (Note, WMATA follows a fiscal calendar from July to June) and Capital Bikeshare
Green Economy
Number of Certified Green Businesses
Definition
Number of green businesses within the study area that have been certified by SBNOW or other local certification programs
Sustainability Relevance
Environmental issues and economic development increasingly intersect and complement each other. Businesses are looking to sustainability as means of reducing costs and meeting new market demands. The growing green economy will make it not only responsible to consider the environment, but profitable as well.
Related Neighborhood Goals
“Increase the Number and Quality of Local Green Businesses; Increase Environmental Management of Buildings; Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’”
Related Actions
Create a list/directory of local green businesses; Create a community award/recognition program for local green businesses
Pilot Project Indicator Target
Target will be set upon initiation of certification program. (Recommended target: 10)
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
“Total non-residential energy use; Total kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Area; % change in total Metro ridership; Average Potable Water Usage; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot area”
Responsible Agent(s)
Workgroup Coordinators
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
Indicator does not reflect the percentage of total businesses within the study area but does indicate a trend toward overall green business growth.
Data Sources
Sustainable Business Network of Washington, Local Green Business Certification Program
References
Green Social Capital
Number of Participants in NSIP Pilot Activities
Definition
Number of people that participate in NSIP Pilot activities within the study area during the reporting year
Sustainability Relevance
While sustainability issues are often confined to environmental and economic relevance, social interaction, education, and quality of life issues contribute directly to a neighborhood’s ability to meet its human needs fairly and efficiently.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’
Related Actions
Establish a Saturday Swap “Freecycle” facility using temporary urbanism opportunities; Create a resource that summarizes existing and promotes new Sustainability Curriculum/education opportunities available in the neighborhood; Create new and improve existing community gardens; Educate/engage community through Green Journal/Newsletter/Website; Organize seminars showcasing community sustainability efforts and best practices; Create an interactive sustainability map to include farmers markets, compost piles etc.
ANC Indicator Target
100 participants to workgroup-led activities in the 2010 reporting year
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
“Total kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Area; # of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot area; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; # of socially-relevant NSIP Pilot activities conducted; # of registered NSIP Pilot website users”
Responsible Agent(s)
Workgroup Coordinators
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
The number of recorded participants in NSIP Pilot activities reflect participation in only those activities that are organized by workgroups and coordinated by the TAC. Various activities conducted by individuals outside of the TAC/workgroup overview may not be captured by this indicator.
Data Sources
NSIP TAC
Methodology / Calculation
For each activity, workgroups are required to keep a record of participants. At the end of the reporting year, the TAC Chair requests all participation records and the total participation is recorded as the indicator.
Number of Sustainability Related Meetings / Activities
Definition
Number of meetings and activities relating to NSIP and other sustainability-related topics
Sustainability Relevance
The number of activities organized at the community level reflects the interest and will of the community to make a positive change.
Related Neighborhood Goals
Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’
Related Actions
Establish a Saturday Swap “Freecycle” facility using temporary urbanism opportunities; Create a resource that summarizes existing and promotes new Sustainability Curriculum/education opportunities available in the neighborhood; Create new and improve existing community gardens; Educate/engage community through Green Journal/Newsletter/Website; Organize seminars showcasing community sustainability efforts and best practices; Create an interactive sustainability map to include farmers markets, compost piles etc.
ANC Indicator Target
20 workgroup-led meetings for the 2010 reporting year
Data Interpretation / Evaluation
Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.
Related Indicator Groups & Indicators
# of certified green businesses; Number of participants in NSIP Pilot activities
Responsible Agent(s)
Workgroup Coordinators
Frequency of Update
Annual
Limitations
The number of sustainability-related meetings or activities does not reflect the scale of the activity within the study area but rather the nature and diversity of activities.
Data Sources
NSIP TAC
Methodology / Calculation
As the coordinator for all NSIP community led activities, the TAC keeps records of each activity and reports the total number of activities as the indicator.