Indicator Details (Draft)

The following Indicators have been selected by the various citizen working groups to be monitored and reported as part of the NSIP effort:

Download the full report (2.1MB PDF)

Green Energy

Green Environment

Green Environment

Green Economy

Green Social Capital

Green Energy

Total residential electrical and gas energy consumption

Definition

Total annual electrical and gas energy consumption for residential units in the Pilot Project area.

Sustainability Relevance

Energy consumption is directly relevant to carbon emissions as well as lifestyle choices. Energy conservation is one of the top priorities identified NSIP’s sustainability vision, as defined by the community.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Increase Energy Conservation; Increase Production of Renewable Energy; and Increase Greener Modes of Transit

Related Actions

Create Energy Audit and Weatherizations Drives in the Community; Organize “Energy Diet” Programs / Challenges; Promote a “Lights Off!” Initiative to Encourage Local Institutions / Residents to Turn Off Non-essential Lights; Conduct Energy Efficiency Drives Promoting EnergyStar Appliances, CFLs, etc.; Conduct Green Roof and Cool Roof Drives for Local Businesses and Institutions.

Pilot Project Indicator Target

22% reduction from 2009 baseline by the year 2020 on annual rate of 2%

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze neighborhood trends in reducing overall residential electrical energy use. Comparisons would be relative to neighborhood performance in previous years. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting NSIP Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

Total non-residential energy use; Total renewable energy production; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area.

Responsible Agent(s)

Office of Planning

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Purely focused on residential electrical consumption. Typically, electrical consumption only accounts for 50-60% of total household energy consumption. The data is aggregated for an entire zip code (20008) and does not include the entire study area.

Data Sources

PEPCO and Washington Gas. PEPCO’s data ranged from November 2008 to October 2009 and included 8568 residential records. Washington Gas’ data was for the 2009 calendar year and included 5,459 residential premises (including group metered apartments).

Methodology / Calculation

Acquire PEPCO and Washington Gas raw data by accounts within zip codes covering the study area and calculate total annual consumption for each residential account. Indicator totals will be the sum of all residential accounts in the selected zip code (20008). Procurement goal would be 100% sample from PEPCO and Washington Gas, however if 100% sample is unfeasible, sample size will be recorded and documented.

References

DC Energy Annual Report, DC Climate Action Plan, PEPCO Data Reports

return to top

Total non-residential electrical and gas energy consumption

Definition

Total annual electrical and gas energy consumption for non-residential units in the Pilot Project Area.

Sustainability Relevance

Energy consumption is directly relevant to carbon emissions as well as lifestyle choices. Energy conservation is one also one of the top priorities defined by the Pilot Project Area’s sustainability vision, as defined by the community.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Increase Energy Conservation; Increase Production of Renewable Energy; and Increase Greener Modes of Transit

Related Actions

Create Energy Audit and Weatherizations Drives in the Community; Organize “Energy Diet” Programs / Challenges; Promote a “Lights Off!” Initiative to Encourage Local Institutions / Residents to Turn Off Non-essential Lights; Conduct Energy Efficiency Drives Promoting EnergyStar Appliances, CFLs, etc.; Conduct Green Roof and Cool Roof Drives for Local Businesses and Institutions

Pilot Project Indicator Target

22% reduction from 2009 baseline by the year 2020 on annual rate of 2%

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze neighborhood trends in reducing overall non-residential electrical energy use. Comparisons would be relative to neighborhood performance in previous years. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting NSIP Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

Total residential energy use; Total renewable energy production; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area

Responsible Agent(s)

Office of Planning

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Purely focused on non-residential electrical consumption. Typically, electrical consumption only accounts for 60-70% of total building energy consumption.

Data Sources

PEPCO and Washington Gas. PEPCO’s data ranged from November 2008 to October 2009 and included 740 commercial records. Washington Gas’ data was for the 2009 calendar year and included 532 non-residential premises (including industrial and non-firm premises).

Methodology / Calculation

Acquire PEPCO and Washington Gas raw data by accounts within study area and calculate total annual consumption for each commercial account. Indicator will be calculated as the sum of all commercial accounts within the selected zip code. Procurement goal would be 100 Procurement goal would be 100% sample from PEPCO and Washington Gas, however if 100% sample is unfeasible, sample size will be recorded and documented.

References

DC Energy Annual Report, DC Climate Action Plan, PEPCO Data Reports

return to top

Total Renewable Energy Production

Definition

Total annual kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Project area

Sustainability Relevance

Renewable energy is green energy. It is also quickly becoming affordable energy. Switching to renewable energy sources like solar, wind, geothermal and biomass, will reduce dependence on a shrinking supply of fossil fuels by producing more renewable energy. The Pilot Project Area can also contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gases that lead to climate change.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Increase Energy Conservation; Increase Production of Renewable Energy; and Increase Greener Modes of Transit; Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’

Related Actions

Create Energy Cooperatives to buy/install renewable energy solutions in the neighborhood residences and businesses; Organize a “Renewable Energy Sign-up” Drive; Organize and host neighborhood workshops about renewable energy products and programs

Pilot Project Indicator Target

Achieve 20% energy from renewable sources by 2020.

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting NSIP Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area

Responsible Agent(s)

Office of Planning

Frequency of Update

At least once / 6 months

Limitations

DDOE data does not capture all renewable energy installations.

Data Sources

DDOE - Energy Office, Neighborhood Energy Cooperatives

Methodology / Calculation

Indicator is calculated directly from raw data collected from DDOE and Neighborhood Energy Cooperatives.

References

DC Energy Annual Report, DC Climate Action Plan

return to top

Number of Buildings That Have Implemented an EMP and/or Adopted a Green Scorecard System

Definition

Number of buildings in the study area that have implemented an Environmental Management Plan and/or have adopted a Green Scorecard System

Sustainability Relevance

The study area has a high population of residents living in multifamily housing developments, and drafting an Environmental Management Plan will enable residents in those buildings to work together to ensure that building maintenance, operations, and communications prioritize sustainable practices. EMPs can similarly benefit other non-single-family-residential buildings like churches, museums, and embassies.

Related Neighborhood Goals

“Increase the Number and Quality of Local Green Businesses; Increase Environmental Management of Buildings; Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’”

Related Actions

Create a condo/business green rating system; Create an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for multifamily dwellings, rentals, churches and other institutional anchors; Organize drive to promote local institutions/businesses/condos to adopt an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) that encourages green operations

ANC Indicator Target

Recommended two pilot EMP buildings by 2011

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

“Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use; Total kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Area; Average Potable Water Usage; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot area”

Responsible Agent(s)

Workgroup Coordinators

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Number of buildings do not necessarily represent the scope of actual implemented measures.

Data Sources

Workgroup records

return to top

Percent of participating buildings that meet or exceed minimum requirements of the neighborhood Green Scorecard

Definition

Number of buildings that have achieved the highest rating possible on their Green Scorecard rating

Sustainability Relevance

Tracking Green Scorecard ratings for buildings ensures active implementation of sustainability measures.

Related Neighborhood Goals

“Increase the Number and Quality of Local Green Businesses; Increase Environmental Management of Buildings; Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’”

Related Actions

Create a condo/business green rating system; Create an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for multifamily dwellings, rentals, churches and other institutional anchors; Organize drive to promote local institutions/businesses/condos to adopt an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) that encourages green operations

Pilot Project Indicator Target

100% of participating buildings exceeding minimum Green Scorecard requirements.

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

“Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use; Total kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Area; % change in total Metro ridership; Average Potable Water Usage; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot area”

Responsible Agent(s)

Workgroup Coordinators

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Measured percentage is only for participating buildings and does not reflect all neighborhood building stock.

Data Sources

Workgroup records

Methodology / Calculation

Comparing participating buildings’ scorecards and counting the quantity of buildings that exceed minimum requirements.

return to top

Green Environment

Average Potable Water Usage

Definition

Average potable water consumption for a typical residential unit in the Pilot Project area on an daily basis

Sustainability Relevance

Water is vital to the survival of our planet, and communities across the nation are facing issues related to water supply and infrastructure. Residential potable water use also contributes significantly to carbon emissions through energy consumption associated with water heaters.

Related Neighborhood Goals

“Increase Water Conservation; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams; Increase Energy Conservation”

Related Actions

Launch “Stop-the-Drip” Campaign to educate residents to repair leaky/wasteful faucets; Launch “Green Gardeners” program to educate/assist local residents, business owners, and institutions on the fundamentals of green gardening practices and LID; Create a Rainwater Harvesting/Greywater reuse initiative to promote reduced potable water use for irrigation

Pilot Project Indicator Target

20% consumption reduction

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

Number of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot Project area; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area

Responsible Agent(s)

Office of Planning

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Data is limited to residential use only and to a partial population. This is still useful for a trend analysis but may not be entirely representative of the total water use within the study area.

Data Sources

WASA

Methodology / Calculation

Data as provided by WASA

References

WASA annual report and other studies

return to top

Number of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot Area

Definition

Total number of homes in the study area that have completed the RiverSmart program through DDOE

Sustainability Relevance

Participation in the RiverSmart Homes program benefits the environment by minimizing the use of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers used in conventional landscaping; stabilizing soils, helping to prevent erosion; providing increased habitat for native wildlife; reducing air pollution and the urban heat island effect; treating and infiltrating stormwater on site helping to recharge groundwater levels; diminishing the impact on aquatic life from polluted stormwater rushing to local streams during storm events.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Increase Water Conservation; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams

Related Actions

Create a Rain Garden/LID resource group that promotes and assists residents/institutions with information/installations; Create a “No-Chemicals!” campaign to reduce chemical pesticides/herbicides/fertilizer use; Launch Initiative to advocate for water quality and LID issues at local public/design review meetings; Facilitate green landscaping workshops for local landscape firms (SARE Coordination)

Pilot Project Indicator Target

Double the number of RiverSmart homes in the study area compared to the 2010 baseline.

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

Average Potable Water Usage; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot Project area

Responsible Agent(s)

Office of Planning

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Indicates participation but not a quantification of water conservation and quality improvements

Data Sources

DDOE

References

http://ddoe.dc.gov

return to top

Water Quality Indicators

Definition

The water quality of the study area is proposed to be monitored by four key indicators. These indicators were selected based on availability of monitoring data for Soapstone Creek within the study area.

Pathogens: Fecal Coliform bacteria in freshwater streams may indicate presence of disease-carrying organisms in the water. The sources of these contaminants are typically wastewater treatment plant discharges, failing septic systems, and animal waste.

Lead (Pb) is a heavy metal contaminant that is usually caused by corrosive plumbing in buildings and can cause serious human health issues.

Total Suspended Solids (TSS) concentrations and turbidity both indicate the amount of solids suspended in the water, whether mineral (e.g., soil particles) or organic (e.g., algae). High concentrations of particulate matter can cause increased sedimentation and siltation in a stream, which in turn can ruin important habitat areas for fish and other aquatic life.

Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) measures the amount of oxygen consumed by microorganisms in decomposing organic matter in stream water. The greater the BOD, the more rapidly oxygen is depleted in the stream. This means less oxygen is available to fish and other aquatic life.

Sustainability Relevance

The health and water quality of the Soapstone Creek impacts the quality of Rock Creek, the Potomac River, and the greater Chesapeake Bay habitat. Reducing the amount of pollutants by adhering to TMDLs helps meet Chesapeake Bay-wide water quality targets and enhances the quality of potable water quality, recreational attractions, and natural habitats.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Increase Water Conservation; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams

Related Actions

Practice organic gardening; Install a rain garden / other Low Impact Development measure; Reduce pervious surfaces to lower stormwater runoff from property; Control pet waste; Decholorinate swimming pool discharge; Reduce waste and trash

Pilot Project Indicator Target

Except for lead, there were no total maximum daily load (TMDL) targets for pollutants in Soapstone Creek. Current monitoring practices use different units for calculating loads than in the recent past so direct comparison of loading is not feasible. Based on historical trends a 25 percent reduction in annual load is targeted for fecal coliform, TSS, BOD and phosphorus. A 36 percent reduction is the target for lead, based on the 2004 TMDL.

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Analysis will document the pollutant levels reported in the DDOE’s annual Discharge Monitoring Report and compare against yearly targets

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

# of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP pilot area; average potable water usage; # of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP pilot area; % of land area under tree canopy

Responsible Agent(s)

Office of Planning

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Pollutants in the Soapstone Creek may originate from activities upstream and beyond the study area, therefore successfully actions to reduce pollutant levels in the study area may not be quantifiable.

Data Sources

Baseline data source: Discharge Monitoring Report (August 2007),Table 10. Calculated Loadings of 20 Pollutants from Wet Weather Events (2006-2007) from Ten Rock Creek Monitoring Stations, p. 17

Target data sources: Decision Rationale TMDL For Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Rock Creek (February 2004), Table 2-TMDL Summary, p. 3; Decision Rationale TMDL Rock Creek for Metals (February 2004), Table 9-Average Annual Total Lead Loads in Rock Creek, p. 15; targets for TSS and BOD are historic TSS and BOD levels found in Discharge Monitoring Report (August 2006),Table 7-9. Load Estimates of 12 Pollutants for The Rock Creek Monitoring Stations (2003-2005)

References

http://ddoe.dc.gov

return to top

Percent of Land Area Under Tree Canopy

Definition

Percent of total land area in the Pilot Project Area that lies directly beneath tree canopy

Sustainability Relevance

Urban forests are recognized as important storage sites for carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas. Trees reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide by directly sequestering carbon dioxide in their stems and leaves as they grow. Trees in urban forests provide additional air quality benefits and can be a sound method for controlling air pollution.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Restore, Enhance, and Protect Tree Canopy; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams

Related Actions

Organize Community Tree Planting Drives (CPTs) with Casey Trees; Institute ‘Adopt-a-Tree’ Campaign to promote care and protection of trees; Protect existing trees during the construction process

Pilot Project Indicator Target

Maintain existing canopy cover.

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

“Number of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot area; Carbon sequestered by trees in the community; Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use”

Responsible Agent(s)

Office of Planning

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Data does not reflect the quality, health, and diversity of tree cover.

Data Sources

DDOE

Methodology / Calculation

GIS analysis using tree-cover layer

References

Casey Trees Interactive Mapping Tools

return to top

Carbon Sequestered by Trees in the Community

Definition

Amount of carbon sequestered by tress planted in the study area

Sustainability Relevance

Urban forests are recognized as important storage sites for carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas. Trees reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide by directly sequestering carbon dioxide in their stems and leaves as they grow. Trees in urban forests provide additional air quality benefits and can be a sound method for controlling air pollution.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Restore, Enhance, and Protect Tree Canopy; Improve Water Quality in Neighborhood Streams

Related Actions

Organize Community Tree Planting Drives (CPTs) with Casey Trees; Institute ‘Adopt-a-Tree’ Campaign to promote care and protection of trees; Protect existing trees during the construction process

Pilot Project Indicator Target

Maintain existing canopy cover.

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

“# of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot area; % of land area under tree canopy; Total residential energy use; Total non-residential energy use”

Responsible Agent(s)

Workgroup Coordinators

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Data is based on approximate tree counts derived from GIS land cover. GHG calculation is based on a generalized carbon sequestration rate for the typical species mix for the study area.

Data Sources

DCOP GIS dataset, Casey Trees

Methodology / Calculation

Estimated GHG calculation is based on an average 40 pounds (0.02 MTons) of Co2 sequestered per tree per year for street trees and 7 MTCoi2e per acre or woodland

References

USEPA, USDA

return to top

Mobility

Percent Change in WMATA and Capital Bikeshare Ridership

Definition

Percent change in average week-day entries in May at Van Ness-UDC and Tenleytown-AU Metros. Percent change in average monthly Capital Bikeshare ridership.

Sustainability Relevance

The District of Columbia is already a national leader in sustainable transportation, ranking 1st nationwide in walkability and 2nd in heavy rail ridership, with 96% of residents live within 1/4 mile of a public transit stop. Increasing transit use in the Pilot area will reduce personal vehicle use, which will lead to improvements in air quality, water quality, and fossil fuel emissions reductions.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Increase Energy Conservation; Increase Production of Renewable Energy; and Increase Greener Modes of Transit

Related Actions

Establish a committee that will review and explore shared shuttle programs with local institutions; Form a group that tracks gaps and improvements on local sidewalks/bikeways and trails; Establish a facebook page to facilitate car pooling

Pilot Project Indicator Target

5% increase in WMATA and Capital Bikeshare ridership from the 2010 baseline

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate. Average week-day enteries in May will be used because WMATA uses May as their most representative month because there are no holidays, major celebrations and weather conditions are usually pretty stable. The Capital Bikeshare baseline data references October 2010 beause that was the only full month of data available. Subsequent reports should document average monthly bikeshare ridership over 12 months.

Responsible Agent(s)

Office of Planning

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Transit users for destinations outside the study area (such as American University) may skew the ridership data for the study area.

Data Sources

WMATA (Note, WMATA follows a fiscal calendar from July to June) and Capital Bikeshare

return to top

Green Economy

Number of Certified Green Businesses

Definition

Number of green businesses within the study area that have been certified by SBNOW or other local certification programs

Sustainability Relevance

Environmental issues and economic development increasingly intersect and complement each other. Businesses are looking to sustainability as means of reducing costs and meeting new market demands. The growing green economy will make it not only responsible to consider the environment, but profitable as well.

Related Neighborhood Goals

“Increase the Number and Quality of Local Green Businesses; Increase Environmental Management of Buildings; Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’”

Related Actions

Create a list/directory of local green businesses; Create a community award/recognition program for local green businesses

Pilot Project Indicator Target

Target will be set upon initiation of certification program. (Recommended target: 10)

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Data will analyze trend / actual values in comparison to national or DC-wide averages. Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

“Total non-residential energy use; Total kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Area; % change in total Metro ridership; Average Potable Water Usage; % of buildings with the highest rating on the Green Scorecard; # of LEED certified buildings in the NSIP Pilot area”

Responsible Agent(s)

Workgroup Coordinators

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

Indicator does not reflect the percentage of total businesses within the study area but does indicate a trend toward overall green business growth.

Data Sources

Sustainable Business Network of Washington, Local Green Business Certification Program

References

www.sbnow.org

return to top

Green Social Capital

Number of Participants in NSIP Pilot Activities

Definition

Number of people that participate in NSIP Pilot activities within the study area during the reporting year

Sustainability Relevance

While sustainability issues are often confined to environmental and economic relevance, social interaction, education, and quality of life issues contribute directly to a neighborhood’s ability to meet its human needs fairly and efficiently.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’

Related Actions

Establish a Saturday Swap “Freecycle” facility using temporary urbanism opportunities; Create a resource that summarizes existing and promotes new Sustainability Curriculum/education opportunities available in the neighborhood; Create new and improve existing community gardens; Educate/engage community through Green Journal/Newsletter/Website; Organize seminars showcasing community sustainability efforts and best practices; Create an interactive sustainability map to include farmers markets, compost piles etc.

ANC Indicator Target

100 participants to workgroup-led activities in the 2010 reporting year

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

“Total kWh/yr of renewable energy produced in NSIP Pilot Area; # of RiverSmart homes in the NSIP Pilot area; # of certified green businesses; # of buildings that have implemented an EMP and/or adopted a Green Scorecard System; # of socially-relevant NSIP Pilot activities conducted; # of registered NSIP Pilot website users”

Responsible Agent(s)

Workgroup Coordinators

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

The number of recorded participants in NSIP Pilot activities reflect participation in only those activities that are organized by workgroups and coordinated by the TAC. Various activities conducted by individuals outside of the TAC/workgroup overview may not be captured by this indicator.

Data Sources

NSIP TAC

Methodology / Calculation

For each activity, workgroups are required to keep a record of participants. At the end of the reporting year, the TAC Chair requests all participation records and the total participation is recorded as the indicator.

return to top

Number of Sustainability Related Meetings / Activities

Definition

Number of meetings and activities relating to NSIP and other sustainability-related topics

Sustainability Relevance

The number of activities organized at the community level reflects the interest and will of the community to make a positive change.

Related Neighborhood Goals

Expand the Community’s ‘Green Social Capital’

Related Actions

Establish a Saturday Swap “Freecycle” facility using temporary urbanism opportunities; Create a resource that summarizes existing and promotes new Sustainability Curriculum/education opportunities available in the neighborhood; Create new and improve existing community gardens; Educate/engage community through Green Journal/Newsletter/Website; Organize seminars showcasing community sustainability efforts and best practices; Create an interactive sustainability map to include farmers markets, compost piles etc.

ANC Indicator Target

20 workgroup-led meetings for the 2010 reporting year

Data Interpretation / Evaluation

Analysis should show current level of progress toward meeting ANC Indicator Target and whether current levels of effort are adequate.

Related Indicator Groups & Indicators

# of certified green businesses; Number of participants in NSIP Pilot activities

Responsible Agent(s)

Workgroup Coordinators

Frequency of Update

Annual

Limitations

The number of sustainability-related meetings or activities does not reflect the scale of the activity within the study area but rather the nature and diversity of activities.

Data Sources

NSIP TAC

Methodology / Calculation

As the coordinator for all NSIP community led activities, the TAC keeps records of each activity and reports the total number of activities as the indicator.

return to top